Legal Opinion

State v. Salazar

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 2005No. 20030732-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THORNE, Judge:

¶ 1 Defendant Edward James Salazar appeals his conviction, upon a conditional guilty plea, for forcible sodomy, a first degree felony. See Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-403 (2003). Salazar argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss because the facts of the case establish the victim’s consent as a matter of law. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 At approximately 4:00 a.m. on November 24, 2004, Salazar entered a bedroom in his cousin’s home where the victim and her boyfriend, Salazar’s cousin, were sleeping. Salazar positioned himself under the victim’s blanket and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tiede v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. MyersUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State, in Interest of JfsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  4. State v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BarelaUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  3. State v. BarelaUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. BarelaUtah Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API