Legal Opinion

Murtha v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 5, 1989No. 88-1967PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NESBITT, Judge.

The defendant appeals a conviction for grand theft contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the physical evidence upon which his conviction was based. We agree and reverse.

A citizen advised a Miami Beach patrolman that the defendant was weaving erratically between towels and people bathing on the beach. The officer observed the defendant who was wearing bathing trunks and carrying a beach towel. His trunks were so obviously large for him that he had to hold them up with his hand.

At that point, the officer walked toward the defendant and motioned…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Norman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  4. Kearse v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  5. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API