Legal Opinion
DeRosa v.Bloch
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided January 16, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSweedler, J.
The defendants make this motion, pursuant to rules 106 and 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for an order dismissing the complaint and for judgment on the pleadings. Upon a motion of this sort the facts stated in the complaint are deemed to be true (Ryder v. Pyrke, 130 Misc. 505; Sweet v. Hollearn, 141 id. 135), and if the plaintiff is entitled to recover on any theory, based upon the facts as stated, the motion must be denied. (Zaepfel v. Parnass, 140 Misc. 539; Matter of Kirkman, 143 id. 342.)
The action is brought under section 15 of the Stock Corporation Law, which renders the directors…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Whalen v. StrongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Trustees of Masonic Hall & Asylum Fund v. FontanaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1917
- Ryder v. PyrkeNew York Supreme Court · 1927
- Singer v. Aquitania Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1930
- Zaepfel v. ParnassNew York Supreme Court · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Johnston v. A. L. Erlanger Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1936
- Millspaugh v. PaduchCity of New York Municipal Court · 1940