National State Bank v. Weil
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
APPEAL BY FLAINTIEE FROM THE COURT OE COMMON PLEAS NO. 1 OE PHILADELPHIA COUNTY. January Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 440 March Term 1887, C. P. No. 1. On April 2, 1887, the National State Bank of Camden, N. J., brought assumpsit against Abraham Weil, filing a statement of claim to recover upon a bank check dated May 26, 1885, drawn on the Shackamaxon Bank by “ A. Weil” to the order of Doughten, Wilkins & Co., for $300, indorsed by Doughten, Wilkins & Co., and…
Read the full summary
APPEAL BY FLAINTIEE FROM THE COURT OE COMMON PLEAS NO. 1 OE PHILADELPHIA COUNTY. January Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 440 March Term 1887, C. P. No. 1. On April 2, 1887, the National State Bank of Camden, N. J., brought assumpsit against Abraham Weil, filing a statement of claim to recover upon a bank check dated May 26, 1885, drawn on the Shackamaxon Bank by “ A. Weil” to the order of Doughten, Wilkins & Co., for $300, indorsed by Doughten, Wilkins & Co., and protested for non-payment. On April 15, 1887, the defendant filed an affidavit of defence, averring as follows: “ That Nthe…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :
We need not add to what the learned judge below has so well said. He has fully covered the case, and we affirm the order for the reasons given by him.
Order affirmed.
2Cited by7 opinions
- S. A. Loux & Son v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Marks v. Anchor Savings BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Wendkos v. Scranton Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Hannon v. Allegheny Bellevue Land Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Murray v. Real Estate Title Insurance & Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.