McKamy v. Cooper
Supreme Court of Georgia
Amendment. Charge of court. Contracts. Infancy. Ratification. Before Judge Fain. Murray superior court. April term, 1888. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Blandford, Justice.
Cooper sued McKamy, as administrator of Miller, upon several promissory notes given in the lifetime of the intestate,'for a ten horse power traction engine. *680The administrator pleaded that, at the time this transaction took place, his intestate was under the age of twenty-one. The case went to trial, and a verdict was found for the plaintiff’; whereupon the administrator moved for a new trial upon several grounds.
1. One of the grounds of the motion for a new trial was, that the court erred in allowing the plaintiff to amend his declaration at the trial by averring that, when…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Hood v. DurenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. DukesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Clemons v. OlshineCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Ullmer v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Willingham v. Morris Plan BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.