Legal Opinion

Holliday v. McGraw Co. (Et Al.)

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 1945No. Appeal, 138PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bx

Dithrich, J.,

Claimant in this workmen’s compensation case suffered from an eye disease known as disseminated choroidoretinitis. The referee found that his eye condition was due to an injury caused by an accident. Because of the “divergence” of the medical testimony, the board on appeal from the referee’s award remanded the case for the purpose of appointment of an impartial medical expert to examine the claimant and the record, and for further hearing. The referee again found that the claimant lost the “industrial vision” of the right eye as a result of the injury and awarded…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bronkowski v. Colonial Colliery Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Harmon v. KnollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Krchmar v. Oakland Beach Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Hercheck v. Donahoe's Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Whiting v. Fibber & Mollie Tea RoomSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Conti v. Butler Consolidated Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API