Legal Opinion

Fox v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 12, 1977No. Appeal, No. 1307 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

Lloyd E. Fox (claimant) filed, bn March 14, 1974, a claim petition for workmen’s compensation benefits in which he alleged that he sustained injuries in an accident occurring on October 17, 1972 while he was employed by Eazor Express, Inc. (Eazor). The workmen’s compensation referee to which the case was assigned made findings of fact that the claimant did sustain a work-related injury while working for Eazor on October 17, 1972 and found as a conclusion of law that the claimant was entitled to compensation benefits. Consequently, the referee made an award order.

On…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Mikalonis v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. House v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Halaski v. Hilton HotelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Innovative Spaces v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Rowan v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Leaseway Systems, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API