Ford v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The evidence authorized the verdict.
In his amended motion the accused contends that the court erred in refusing to permit counsel to propound to the prospective jurors, in addition to the voir dire questions set forth in the Code, § 59-806, the following question: “Were you acquainted with the deceased, Bailey?” Counsel stated at the time that he sought the information to use it in the determination of the twenty challenges allowed the defendant, and not as grounds for the disqualification of jurors. It is contended that the ruling was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Herndon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Arthur v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Epps v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
- Baugh v. City of LaGrangeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ledford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Whisman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Timothy Wesley McCorquodale v. Charles Balkcom, Warden, Georgia State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Fields v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- Grude v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.