Legal Opinion

Burns v. City of Enid

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 31, 1923No. 13837PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■Opinion by

PINKHAM, C.

This was an action commenced in the district court of Garfield county, Okla., by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff in the court below, against the city of Enid, its mayor and commissioners, and the garbage contractors of said city to prevent the enforcement of the provisions of ordinance No. 1212 of said city of Enid.

The case comes to this court upon the appeal of the plaintiff in the court below from an order of the district court of Garfield county sustaining the demurrer of the ■defendants to the petition of the plaintiff and dismissing his action.

The sole and only…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. California Reduction Co. v. Sanitary Reduction WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Jones v. BrimSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Southern Disposal, Inc. v. Texas Waste ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  2. Morris v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Ex Parte SmallCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. Gardner v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
  5. Hale v. WarrenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API