Legal Opinion
Kearney v. Pierson
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 15, 1912No. Civ. No. 1017Published
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. T. W. Harris, Judge. The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Kearney v. Palmer, ante, p. 517, with the exception stated by the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
This case is in all respects similar to the case of Hattie M. Kearney v. John Palmer et al., ante, p. 517, [123 Pac. 611], save that the action is one in ejectment and not *522to quiet title, and for the same reasons the judgment is affirmed.
Lennon, P. J., and Kerrigan, J., concurred.
A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on May 15, 1912.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kearney v. PalmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912