Legal Opinion

Brintley v. Hutzel Hospital

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1989No. Docket 111933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant Hutzel Hospital appeals from the circuit court’s denial of its motion for summary disposition or to compel arbitration. Plaintiffs sued defendant for medical malpractice arising out of plaintiff Ida Brintley’s hospitalization. Defendant moved for summary disposition or to compel arbitration on the grounds that Mrs. Brintley had entered into a binding agreement to arbitrate any claims arising out of her care and treatment at defendant hospital. Plaintiffs argued that the arbitration agreement was invalid because it was not executed in strict compliance with the Medical Malpractice…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McKinstry v. Valley Obstetrics-Gynecology Clinic, PCMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Ewald v. Pontiac General HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. McKain v. MooreMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Haywood v. FowlerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Kosmyna v. Botsford Community HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API