Jamal Che Glenn v. State of Florida

Appellant challenges the trial court’s order summarily denying his Rule 3.860 motion and imposing sanctions for frivolous filings. Appellant pleaded guilty to murder and robbery on the advice of his counsel. He now claims that his counsel was (or should have been) aware of a scientific report supporting his claim of innocence. The trial court summarily dismissed the claim as untimely, noting Appellant filed his motion more than two years after his judgment and sentence became final.

Rule 3.850’s two-year limitations period includes ■ an exception for situations . in which “the, facts on which…