Legal Opinion

In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Miller

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided August 14, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Whitbeck, S.

This matter comes on for decision as to whether the proofs and circumstances offered are sufficient to entitle an alleged nuncupative will of the decedent to be admitted to probate. In approaching the matter I have given some examination of the origin and meaning of such wills in the body of the law. It appears that it originated so far as can be determined in the Roman civil law. and as such was- in fact an oral will declared by the testator before witnesses and afterwards reduced to writing from their testimony; such a will was supposed to have been made in extremis or under…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hoysradt v. . KingmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. In Re the Probate of the Will of MalleryNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of MalleryNew York Surrogate's Court · 1926
  4. Ex parte ThompsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1856
  5. In re the Estate of HickeyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Probate of the Will of ZaiacNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. In re the Estate of ZaiacNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  3. In re the Estate of DumontNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
  4. In re the Estate of SheridanEssex County Surrogate's Court · 1943
  5. In re the Probate of the Will of ThompsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API