Legal Opinion

Weissman v. Weissman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 2009PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*982The parties’ stipulation of settlement was incorporated but not merged into the judgment of divorce; as such, it is an independent contract which may be challenged only by way of a plenary action (see Reiter v Reiter, 39 AD3d 616 [2007]; Spataro v Spataro, 268 AD2d 467 [2000]; Dombrowski v Dombrowski, 239 AD2d 460 [1997]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs motion to vacate the stipulation on that basis alone.

Those branches of the plaintiffs motion which were to direct the defendant to transfer the title to the marital residence to her and for permission to sell the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spataro v. SpataroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Dombrowski v. DombrowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Reiter v. ReiterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weissman v. WeissmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Weissman v. WeissmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Sudaka-Karlsson v. KarlssonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Sudaka-Karlsson v. KarlssonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API