Legal Opinion

Fellabaum v. Swift & Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 11, 1944No. 4683PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLOEB, District Judge.

The defendant, Swift and Company, maintains a branch office and warehouse in Toledo, Ohio, wherein it receives shipments of meat and some canned goods from the States of Illinois, Wisconsin, Nebraska, Missouri, New York and Minnesota, from plants owned and operated by the defendant company in those various States. These meats and canned goods, upon arrival in Toledo, are stored in the warehouse, where provisions are had for refrigeration and much of it is processed at this location by way of manufacturing the meat into sausage, smoked meats, etc. As to such part of its…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Higgins v. Carr Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Jewel Tea Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  4. Jax Beer Co. v. RedfernCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  5. Walling v. Goldblatt Bros.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Maloy v. FriedmanDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1948
  2. Adams v. St. Johns River Shipbuilding Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1947
  3. Harrison v. Preston Trucking Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1962
  4. Hoff v. North American Aviation, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1946
  5. Rigney v. Wilson & Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API