Legal Opinion

Guarantee Reserve Life Insurance v. Norris

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 29, 1963No. 40120PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

1. The sole basis of the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict on the question of penalty and attorneys fees was that sixty days did not elapse between the demand for payment and the filing of the action. As shown from the pleadings quoted the defendant admitted a demand and that on December 21, 1961, it denied liability under the policy and had failed and refused to pay at all times since. In response to a separate paragraph of the petition the defendant denied that sixty days had elapsed between the demand and the date of filing suit. Where an answer both admits…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. New Zealand Fire Insurance v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. City of Moultrie v. Schofield's Sons Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  3. Williams Manufacturing Co. v. Warner Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. Zittrouer v. ZittrouerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  5. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. HardinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American Reliable Insurance v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  2. Guarantee Reserve Life Insurance v. NorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  3. Guarantee Reserve Life Insurance v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API