Legal Opinion

Hearon ex rel. Willey v. Hearon

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 18, 1979No. 7929SC384PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Plaintiff correctly argues that it was improper for the trial judge to collaterally review the competency proceeding, and that the defendant had no standing to attack the determination of incompetency.

Defendant’s argument that her opposition to plaintiffs motion for substitution was not a collateral attack upon the order appointing a general guardian is untenable. Black’s Law Dictionary 327 (Rev. 4th ed. 1968) defines a collateral attack upon a judicial proceeding as “an attempt to avoid, defeat, or evade it, or deny its force and effect, in some incidental proceeding not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Card v. Finch.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Shaver v. ShaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re WebberCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Regional Acceptance Corp. v. Old Republic Surety Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. State v. CortezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. In re Petition for Reinstatement of McGeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. Knc Techs., LLC v. TuttonNorth Carolina Business Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API