Legal Opinion

Daniel Melancon v. Amoco Productions Company, Etc. v. Beraud Enterprises, Inc., Third Party

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 22, 1988No. 86-4491PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

(Opinion Jan. 6, 1988, 5th Cir.1988, 834 F.2d 1238)

2Per curiam

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing filed in the above entitled and numbered cause be and the same is hereby GRANTED for the sole purpose of amending the last paragraph before the VI Conclusion on page 1184 of the slip opinion [834 F.2d 1248] Amoco is not entitled to the. costs incurred in establishing its indemnity claim against Beraud. “[T]he indemnitee may not recover those costs and expenses incurred simply establishing the indemni-tees [sic] right to indemnification from the indemnitors.” State v.…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The Dow Chemical Company v. The M/v Roberta Tabor, and M/v Sugarland Etc., American River Transportation Company and Scott Chotin, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  2. State v. Laconco, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1983

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Foreman v. DANOS AND CUROLE MARINE CONT.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Fanguy v. Dupre Bros. Const. Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Robertson v. W & T OFFSHORE, INC.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2010
  4. Cooper v. Offshore Express, Inc.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1989
  5. Kerr v. Smith Petroleum Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API