Legal Opinion
Kluge v. Fugazy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 29, 1988PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In an action, inter alla, to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants William D. Fugazy, Fugazy Continental Corp., Travelco, Inc., Fugazy International Corp. and Fugazy Travel and Incentive Corp. appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.), entered January 13, 1988, which denied their motion to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action and to vacate the plaintiff’s notice of pendency.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is granted.
As the result of a series of financial transactions, the *538plaintiff…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chimart Associates v. PaulNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Nau v. Vulcan Rail & Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Merritt v. . BartholickNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
- Flyer v. SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Manne v. CarlsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
3Cited by29 opinions
- U.S. Bank, N.A. v. CollymoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Bank of New York v. SilverbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Veal v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. (In Re Veal)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas v. VitellasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Slutsky v. Blooming Grove Inn, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.