Legal Opinion
Cantwell v. Cantwell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided December 3, 1993No. 186PA93PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
After reviewing the record proper and the briefs of the parties and considering the oral arguments of counsel, we conclude that defendant-appellant’s petition for discretionary review was improvidently allowed.
DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Lovendahl v. WickerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Sugg v. FieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Jackson v. S.T. Hill BuildersNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2007