Legal Opinion

Cantwell v. Cantwell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 3, 1993No. 186PA93PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

After reviewing the record proper and the briefs of the parties and considering the oral arguments of counsel, we conclude that defendant-appellant’s petition for discretionary review was improvidently allowed.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lovendahl v. WickerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. Sugg v. FieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Jackson v. S.T. Hill BuildersNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2007