Legal Opinion

Stine v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 3, 1973No. 58911PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Goldberg

The Chicago Transit Authority, a municipal corporation, and the individual members of its governing body, the Chicago Transit Board, (defendants) appeal from an order granting a preliminary injunction against them which will shortly be described. This order was entered on motion of the original plaintiffs, Francis B. Stine and Nathaniel L. Nathanson and also of four intervenors: city of Evanston, village of Wilmette, Carl Leonard and other persons acting with Businessmen for the Public Interest and also Ravenswood Manor Improvement Association acting with two individuals. Only the city of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lonergan v. Crucible Steel Co. of AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. The People v. Chi. Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Chicago Motor Coach Co. v. BuddAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952
  4. Appeal Board of the Department of Environmental Control v. United States Steel Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Village of Glencoe v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Burns v. Regional Transportation AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  2. Board of Education v. Peoria Education Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  3. Ware v. D.R.G., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  4. People Ex Rel. Foreman v. Sojourners Motorcycle Club, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  5. People ex rel. Fahner v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API