East v. Matthews
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALL, Judge.
¶ 1 The question raised in this appeal is whether a family court abuses its discretion in making a determination of child support in a paternity action when it chooses not to consider the standai’d of living a child would have had if she had lived with both of her parents. For reasons that follow, we conclude that it does.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 Jamie Lee East brought this paternity action against Gary Matthews, Jr. following the bix’th of their daughter in 2004. Matthews is a professional baseball player. It was established in the family court that his income is appx’oximately…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- STATE EX REL. BRANNAN v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Edgar v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Ortiz v. RappeportCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991