Legal Opinion

East v. Matthews

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 25, 2009No. 1 CA-CV 08-0356Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALL, Judge.

¶ 1 The question raised in this appeal is whether a family court abuses its discretion in making a determination of child support in a paternity action when it chooses not to consider the standai’d of living a child would have had if she had lived with both of her parents. For reasons that follow, we conclude that it does.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 Jamie Lee East brought this paternity action against Gary Matthews, Jr. following the bix’th of their daughter in 2004. Matthews is a professional baseball player. It was established in the family court that his income is appx’oximately…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. STATE EX REL. BRANNAN v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. Edgar v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  4. Ortiz v. RappeportCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API