Legal Opinion

Kinasz-Reagan v. Ohio Department of Job & Family Services

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 2005No. 85768PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Patricia Ann Blackmon, Administrative Judge.

{¶ 1} Appellant, Mary Kinasz-Reagan, appeals the trial court’s judgment affirming the decision of the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services (“the agency”), which imposed a period of restrictive coverage for Medicaid benefits as a result of an improper transfer of real estate. On appeal, Reagan assigns the following errors for our review:

I. The trial court erred in ruling that the ruling of the administrative agency was based on reliable, probative, and substantive evidence. The trial court erred as a matter of law and also abused its discretion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pons v. Ohio State Medical BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Wood v. TompkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  3. Moran v. Ohio Dept. of Commerce, Division of Real EstateOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Albert v. Ohio Department of Human ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. RomineOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Communicare v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Tiggs c/o Indian hills Healthcare Group, Inc. v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Tiggs c/o Indian hills Healthcare Group, Inc. v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API