Legal Opinion

M'Rae v. Buck

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1832PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In error from Tuskaloosa Circuit Court This suit was instituted on the chancery side of Tuskaloosa Circuit court, by McRae, to -review a settlement of accounts, once existing between himself and the defendants in error, as joint .owners of . a barge. The matters of difference had been, some six years before the filing of the bill, submitted to arbitrators, who had made an award.

Read the full summary

In error from Tuskaloosa Circuit Court This suit was instituted on the chancery side of Tuskaloosa Circuit court, by McRae, to -review a settlement of accounts, once existing between himself and the defendants in error, as joint .owners of . a barge. The matters of difference had been, some six years before the filing of the bill, submitted to arbitrators, who had made an award. The complainant alleged, as a ground for the relief of chancery, that the arbitrators had committed a mistake as -to the law of the case, by which an injury had ensued. The chancellor dismissed the bill, and from his…

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

From the view which I take of this case, I consider it wholly unnecessary to enter into a general investigation of the merits.

The-bill, which was filed loth September, 1826,. states, that in 1820, complainant and defendants were part owners of the barge Mary, of which complainant was the master; that differences arose between them, which were, late in that year, referrred to arbitrators ; that an award was made, by which complainant was greatly injured, from a mistake of law made by tbe arbitrators; that complainant had freighted on said boat, goods, &c., for one Merritt, of Mobile, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. M'Jimsey v. TraverseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1827

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Glens Falls Ins. Co. of New York v. GarnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API