Legal Opinion
Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railroad v. Tyng
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 15, 1874Published
1Opinion of the CourtBrady, J.
— This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon the report of judge Sutheeland as a referee. The following statement by the respondent’s counsel, of the averments in the pleadings and of the facts established on the trial, is adopted as a correct exposition of the material facts.
“ The complaint charged that, by false representations, the defendant induced the plaintiffs to purchase, through his *194instrumentality, two locomotives, called the ‘ Maryland ’ and ‘ Waterford,’ at $26,000, as the lowest attainable price, and for that purpose obtained from the plaintiffs the $26,000, and also $500, as…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bennett v. . JudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Sandford v. HandyNew York Supreme Court · 1840
- Hubbell v. . MeigsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Oberlander v. . SpiessNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Ross v. . MatherNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.