Legal Opinion

Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railroad v. Tyng

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1874Published

1Opinion of the CourtBrady, J.

— This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon the report of judge Sutheeland as a referee. The following statement by the respondent’s counsel, of the averments in the pleadings and of the facts established on the trial, is adopted as a correct exposition of the material facts.

“ The complaint charged that, by false representations, the defendant induced the plaintiffs to purchase, through his *194instrumentality, two locomotives, called the ‘ Maryland ’ and ‘ Waterford,’ at $26,000, as the lowest attainable price, and for that purpose obtained from the plaintiffs the $26,000, and also $500, as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bennett v. . JudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Sandford v. HandyNew York Supreme Court · 1840
  3. Hubbell v. . MeigsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Oberlander v. . SpiessNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. Ross v. . MatherNew York Court of Appeals · 1872

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API