Legal Opinion

Denson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 29, 1999No. A99A1865PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

Following a jury trial, Roy Eugene Denson appeals his conviction of theft by receiving stolen property, contending that the State failed to establish an essential element of the offense and failed to introduce evidence of the value of the stolen property as required by OCGA § 16-8-12. The State proved the offense but failed to prove the value of the stolen property exceeded $500. Therefore, we affirm the conviction, vacate the sentence and remand the case for resentencing as a misdemeanor.

1. Denson contends the State failed to prove the essential elements of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  3. Barber v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Searcy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  5. Baker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Campbell v. BeakCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. DeLong v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  3. Duncan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Graham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Waters v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API