Legal Opinion

(HC) Manley v. Campbell

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 22, 2023No. 2:23-cv-00039Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NABIL IBN MANLEY, Case No. 2:23-cv-00039-JDP (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA 13 v. PAUPERIS 14 TAMMY CAMPBELL, ECF No. 5 15 Respondent. SCREENING ORDER FINDING THAT THE PETITION DOES NOT STATE A 16 COGNIZABLE SECTION 2254 CLAIM AND GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND WITHIN 17 THIRTY DAYS 18 ECF No. 1 19 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, seeks a writ of habeas corpus 20 under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. After reviewing the petition, I find that it fails…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Swarthout v. CookeSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Danny BOYD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. S. Frank THOMPSON, Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Martin Valdez, Jr. v. W. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. Styre v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API