Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Toohey

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 2012No. 26073Published

1DissentSeverson, Justice

[¶ 31.] I respectfully dissent. “Our review of the sufficiency of the evidence is de novo.” State v. Plenty Horse, 2007 S.D. 114, ¶ 5, 741 N.W.2d 763, 764 (quoting State v. Tofani, 2006 S.D. 63, ¶ 35, 719 N.W.2d 391, 400). When reviewing a claim of insufficiency of the evidence, the question is “whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” People ex rel. W.T.M., 2010 S.D. 45, ¶ 15, 785 N.W.2d 264, 267 (quoting In re J.H., 2008 S.D. 88, ¶ 13, 756…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. Leo Plenty Arrows, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  3. State v. TofaniSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Atteberry v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Spurlock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API