Cole v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdajis, J.
When tbe injury occurred tbe defendant was engaged, and tbe plaintiff was employed by tbe defendant, in interstate commerce. This is admitted. Tbe case must therefore be determined by tbe Federal Employers’ Liability Act and tbe principles of tbe common law as applied in tbe courts of tbe United States. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad Co. v. Allen, 276 U. S., 165, 72 Law Ed., 513. Before this act was passed tbe liability of employers engaged in interstate commerce for injuries suffered by their employees while engaged in such commerce was governed by tbe laws of tbe several states,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Mondou v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. HerbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. CravenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
- Newbern v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- Southern Railway Company v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
- Southern Railway Co. v. CowanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Escandon v. Pan American Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.