Kreiter v. Nichols
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Hillsdale Circuit.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
The defendant in error is the wife of Matthew Nichols, and brought suit in the court below to recover of Kreiter the damages sustained by her in being injured in her means of support through the intoxication of her husband, induced by liquors which she alleged Kreiter had furnished him. The suit was brought under an amendment of the prohibitory liquor law, so-called, which was adopted April 18, 1871 [Laws 1871,- Vol. 1, p. 363], and which expressly provides that “every wife, child, parent, guardian, husband or other person, who shall be injured in person, property, means of support or…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Day v. WoodworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
3Cited by21 opinions
- Aroma Wines & Equipment, Inc v. Columbian Distribution Services, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
- Pegram v. StortzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1888
- Duncan v. BeresMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Osborne v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
- Ganssly v. PerkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.