Legal Opinion
Lisenbee v. Parr
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided July 31, 1970PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TODD, Judge.
This is a boundary dispute which the chancellor resolved in favor of the defend*363ants, Robert L. Parr and wife, Gladys M. Parr; and the complainants, H. M. Lisen-bee and wife, Carrie B. Lisenbee, have appealed.
The sole assignment of error challenges the chancellor’s determination of the location of the disputed boundary, which consists of a 22 foot private driveway between the property of complainants on the east and the property of defendants on the west.
Appendix A is a simplified, unsealed, schematic representation of the area of the controversy and relative location of'…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bigham v. MadisonTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
- Morrison v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1968
- Walker v. TannerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
- Richards v. EwingTennessee Supreme Court · 1850
3Cited by6 opinions
- Maurer v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1993
- Downing v. EubanksIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Stone v. BrickeyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- Billy Conatser v. L.D. (Joe) BallCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- Don Stone v. Donald BrickeyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.