Legal Opinion

Highsmith v. City of Waycross

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 6, 1910No. 2477PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Certiorari; from Ware superior court — Judge Parker. February 1, 1910.

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.

The lieadnotes control the case. If they did not control it by an affirmance, we would be inclined to take up the motion to dismiss, but the result we have reached being the same that would be reached by the motion to dismiss, and being capable of accomplishment with less effort, we have allowed the case to take this direction. The motion to dismiss is based on the ground that after the bill of exceptions was certified by the judge and service was acknowledged by counsel for the defendant in error, the attorney for the plaintiff in error altered it by adding his signature, thus attempting to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Miller v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. King v. City of HazlehurstCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  3. Wolf v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  4. Braswell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  5. Guilford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API