Legal Opinion

Mershon v. Oregonian Publishing

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 23, 1988No. 85-11970; CA A42850PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board affirming the referee’s dismissal of his claim for failure to comply with a prehearing order requiring discovery.

Claimant sought a hearing on employer’s denial of the claim. Before the hearing, employer sought a private meeting with claimant’s physician. Claimant instructed his physician to refuse to meet with employer unless claimant’s attorney was also present. The referee, relying on a Board opinion, held that employer was entitled to “full, complete and private access” to claimant’s physician. The referee issued orders…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mershon v. Oregonian PublishingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  2. Mershon v. Oregonian PublishingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API