Nix v. Hassell
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BLOODWORTH, Justice.
This is an appeal from a final decree of the circuit court of Talladega County, Alabama, in equity, establishing a disputed boundary line between property of the appellants and appellees.
Appellants, Nix, assign as error: (1) The court erred in overruling their motion to exclude the evidence; (2) the court erred in overruling their motion for rehearing.
Appellees, Hassell, contend that the trial court can never be put in error for overruling a motion to exclude in a civil case; and, that a decree overruling an application for rehearing is not appealable. These contentions…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Whiteport v. WhiteportSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- Baker v. Citizens Bank of GuntersvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Robinson v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Western Railway of Alabama v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
- Jack Cole Co. v. HaysSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Jasper Coca-Cola Bottling Company v. RobertsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971