Legal Opinion

Nix v. Hassell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 29, 1969No. 7 Div. 839PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLOODWORTH, Justice.

This is an appeal from a final decree of the circuit court of Talladega County, Alabama, in equity, establishing a disputed boundary line between property of the appellants and appellees.

Appellants, Nix, assign as error: (1) The court erred in overruling their motion to exclude the evidence; (2) the court erred in overruling their motion for rehearing.

Appellees, Hassell, contend that the trial court can never be put in error for overruling a motion to exclude in a civil case; and, that a decree overruling an application for rehearing is not appealable. These contentions…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Whiteport v. WhiteportSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  2. Baker v. Citizens Bank of GuntersvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  3. Robinson v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  4. Western Railway of Alabama v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  5. Jack Cole Co. v. HaysSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  2. Jasper Coca-Cola Bottling Company v. RobertsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API