Legal Opinion
Kimberly-Clark Corporation v. Marzall, Commissioner of Patents (Two Cases)
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 1, 1952No. 10932, 10933PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judge.
Each of these appeals presents the question whether a combination of two surnames is registrable as a trade-mark. The principal difference between the two oases is that one was brought under the Act of February 20, 1905, as amended, 15 U.S.C.A. § 81 et seq., and the other under the Act of July 5, 1946, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1051 et seq.
No. 10,932. Kimberly-Clark Corporation, a manufacturer of paper and paper products, applied under the Act of 1905 for registration of a trade-mark consisting of the words “A Product of Kimberly Clark Research,” within a scroll border…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Estate of P. D. Beckwith, Inc. v. Commissioner of PatentsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Nichols v. Universal Pictures CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929
- In Re Midy Laboratories, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
- In re Meyer Bros. Coffee & Spice Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1908
3Cited by5 opinions
- A. T. Cross Company v. Jonathan Bradley Pens, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Application of Standard Elektrik Lorenz AktiengesellschaftCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Drexel Enterprises, Inc. v. Hermitage Cabinet Shop, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1967
- Application of Ada Milling CoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- Application of Ada Milling CoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953