Legal Opinion
In re Gill
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided September 21, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Case 21 — HABEAS CORPUS APPEAL FROM BRANDENBURG POLICE COURT.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE BENNETT
delivered the opinion of the’court.
The petition and admitted facts show that Zack Gill was, according to legal form and substance, incarcerated in the Meade county jail, without the right to give bail, to answer the charge of murder; that the petitioner, or his next friend, applied to the Police Judge of Brandenburg (the circuit and county judges being absent from the county) for a writ of habeas corpus to take said Zack Gill from the custody of the jailer of Meade county and try him on a charge of insanity.
*119Upon the admission being made in open court that Zack Gf-ill was held by…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Rallihan v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Department of Public Welfare v. PolsgroveCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Proffer v. Stewart, County JudgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
- Black v. Demaree, JailerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925