Legal Opinion

United States v. Spring

District Court, D. Maine

Decided September 12, 2011No. 1:11-cr-00053PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., Chief Judge.

The Court concludes that the Defendant’s due process argument may not be reached in a motion to dismiss the indictment because it depends upon the resolution of facts that must be decided by a jury. The Court further concludes that the Government has not violated the Speedy Trial Act’s thirty-day provision between arrest and indictment and that charges brought under 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6) and § 924(a)(1)(A) are not multiplicitous.

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS

On April 13, 2011, a federal grand jury indicted Kevin Earl Spring for making a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Bank of Nova Scotia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Bloate v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. MoroscoDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API