United States v. Spring
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS
JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., Chief Judge.
The Court concludes that the Defendant’s due process argument may not be reached in a motion to dismiss the indictment because it depends upon the resolution of facts that must be decided by a jury. The Court further concludes that the Government has not violated the Speedy Trial Act’s thirty-day provision between arrest and indictment and that charges brought under 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6) and § 924(a)(1)(A) are not multiplicitous.
I. STATEMENT OF FACTS
On April 13, 2011, a federal grand jury indicted Kevin Earl Spring for making a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Bank of Nova Scotia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bloate v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. MoroscoDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014