Legal Opinion

Al-Sadeai v. U.S. Immigration and Custom Enforcement

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 25, 2025No. 3:21-cv-00296Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ADBULKAREEM TAHER AHMED AL- Case No. 3:21-cv-00296-GPC-MDD SADEAI, 12 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR Plaintiff, 13 ATTORNEYS’ FEES v. 14 [ECF No. 14] US. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS 15 ENFORCEMENT et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Before the Court is Abdulkareem Taher Ahmed Al-Sedeai’s1 (“Plaintiff” or “Al- 19 Sedeai”) Motion for Attorney’s Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) 20 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412. ECF No. 14 (“Motion” or “Mot.”). Respondent 21 Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE” or “the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Jennings v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  4. Demore v. KimSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API