Allman v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAIDIK, Judge
Appellant, Suzanne M. Allman, challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting her conviction for Operating a Vehicle with at least ten-hundredths percent (.10%) of alcohol by weight in grams in one hundred (100) milliliters of blood, 1 a class C misdemeanor. At trial, Allman’s blood alcohol, which was .104% sometime after the accident, was offered into evidence. However, because the State did not establish the precise time of the accident, the State was not permitted to rely on a statutory presumption which would have permitted the jury to presume Allman’s blood…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Platt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Sales v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Mordacq v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Sullivan v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mata v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- State v. BaldwinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- Morgan Mannix v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- Disbro v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.