Legal Opinion

Allman v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 17, 2000No. 17A04-9908-CR-381PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge

Appellant, Suzanne M. Allman, challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting her conviction for Operating a Vehicle with at least ten-hundredths percent (.10%) of alcohol by weight in grams in one hundred (100) milliliters of blood, 1 a class C misdemeanor. At trial, Allman’s blood alcohol, which was .104% sometime after the accident, was offered into evidence. However, because the State did not establish the precise time of the accident, the State was not permitted to rely on a statutory presumption which would have permitted the jury to presume Allman’s blood…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Platt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Sales v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Mordacq v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Sullivan v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mata v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  2. State v. BaldwinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Morgan Mannix v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Disbro v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API