Legal Opinion

Ohio Oil Co. v. Yacktman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 17, 1976No. 60904PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stamos

Ohio Oil Company, plaintiff, brought an action for specific performance against Victor Yacktman, and other defendants, predicated upon an option to purchase provision in a lease between the parties. Finding no material contested issues of fact, the trial court granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Pursuant thereto, specific performance of the provisions of a leasing agreement entered into by these parties, together with costs, was decreed in favor of plaintiff. In accordance with this decree, defendants were directed to convey certain realty to plaintiff in compliance with…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fooden v. Board of GovernorsIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Carruthers v. B. C. Christopher & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Cities Service Oil Co. v. VieringIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Gliwa v. Washington Polish Loan & Building Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
  5. Chicago Daily News, Inc. v. KohlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Terracom Development Group, Inc. v. Coleman Cable & Wire Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  2. Kwak v. St. Anthony De Padua HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. Local 165, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. BradleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. Kellner v. BartmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. In Re Estate of GarbalinskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API