Legal Opinion

Carlberg v. Field

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal'from Circuit Court, Corson County. Hon. Clay Carpenter, Judge. Action by Albert B. Carlberg against A. L. Field and others. From an order denying a new trial, made after an appeal 'from a judgment for plaintiff had been taken'by defendants, defendants appeal; and plaintiff moves to dismiss thé appeal. No briefs were filed by either party upon the motion to dismiss appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Application by respondent to require appellants to show cause why ah appeal should not be dismissed. The affidavit upon which the order was granted discloses that judgment was entered in the circuit court of Corson county, for $1,500 and costs, on the 20th of April, 1912; that'on the 17th of July, 1912, defendants, who are appellants 'here, took an appeal from that judgment; that upon such appeal appellants failed to comply with the *210rules - of -this1 court requiring the printing, serving, and filing of briefs; and on motion of respondent the appeal was unconditionally dismissed -for- that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Knowles v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Gade v. CollinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Schnittger v. RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Schuek v. HagarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  5. Naglee v. SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carlberg v. FieldsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Hayden v. City of SissetonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API