Ginsberg v. Wade
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.
The evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict.
Special ground 1 assigns error because it is alleged that the court ei'red in charging the jury as follows: “I give you in chargé Code § 61-111: The landlord must keep the premises in repair, and shall be liable for all substantial improvements placed upon them by his consent.” It is contended that the lease created an estate for years and that the tenant was liable for repairs. It is true that a tenant for years is bound for all repairs and other expenses for the preservation of the leased property during the term of the contract. See Code §…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Williamson, Inman & Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Whitley v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Midtown Chain Hotels Co. v. BenderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Johnson v. BriceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Jones v. LoveCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hathaway v. GorfineCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Thirsk v. Coldwell Banker/Barton & Ludwig RealtorsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- International Industries, Inc. v. DantoneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Ginsberg v. WadeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957