Legal Opinion
In Re Michaud
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided December 30, 2008No. 19-10125PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
J. MICHAEL DEASY, Bankruptcy Judge.
1. INTRODUCTION
At issue in the above-captioned three cases, and in others pending before the Court, is whether the debtors’ chapter 13 plans should be confirmed over the objection of Lawrence P. Sumski, the chapter 13 trustee (the “Trustee”), wherein the Trustee alleges that the debtors are not using all of their disposable income to fund their chapter 13 plans, as required by 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(1)(B), 1 because the debtors over withhold their federal income tax, as evidenced by their receipt of large federal income tax refunds last year.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kibbe v. SumskiBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2007
- In Re BalcerowskiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2006
- In Re NjugunaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2006
- In Re BernardUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- In Re RaybonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re KruseUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 2009
- In re MoralesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- In re RamosUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2013
- In Re RodgerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2010
- In Re WatsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.