In re Harris
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The respondent was served with a petition that contained 13 charges of professional misconduct against him. In his answer, the respondent admitted some of the factual allegations contained in the petition and denied that he was guilty of any professional misconduct. After the hearing, the Special Referee sustained all of the charges against the respondent except Charges Three and Four. The Grievance Committee now moves to confirm the Special Referee’s report. The respondent cross-moves to confirm the Special Referee’s report insofar as it failed to sustain Charges Three…
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re WeinsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Schmidt v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000