Legal Opinion

Martin v. Nelson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 23, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Memorandum.—Assumpsit for commissions of real estate agent. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Washington County; the Hon. George W. Wall, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the February term, 1894, and affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scofield

Appellants sued appellees for commissions on the sale of lands in Washington county, effected, as the evidence shows, without their instrumentality. As a consideration to support their claim to such commissions, appellants testified to a contract with appellee Nelson, at one time, and with appellee Lyon at another time, whereby appellants were to receive $50 for every man sent to Kansas by them with whom a land trade should be effected, and a certain commission on the sale of any land in Washington county, with or without the aid or intervention of appellants. On the other hand appellees…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bensley v. BrockwayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1888
  2. Lockridge v. NuckollsIllinois Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Heidelmeier v. HechtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
  2. Goebel & Wetterau v. Montgomery & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API