Legal Opinion

In re Crumb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 29, 2009PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, in 1981. He maintained a law office in the City of Binghamton, Broome County. He is currently suspended from practice (Matter of Crumb, 50 AD3d 1310 [2008]).

Respondent has not answered or otherwise replied to a petition of charges or to petitioner’s, instant motion for a default judgment, both of which were personally served upon him. In support of its motion, petitioner has filed proof by affidavit of the facts constituting the alleged misconduct. Under the circumstances, respondent is deemed to have admitted…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re LucasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matter of CastilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. In re EhrlichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. In re DoyleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. In re DoyleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. MatterofDoyleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API