Legal Opinion
In re Cremidas' Estate
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided March 16, 1953No. Civ. No. 3817PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, District Judge.
On July 19, 1949, this Court, after a hearing, entered an order setting aside previous orders of the Probate Court for the Cape Nome Precinct, Second Division, Territory of Alaska, decreeing one Marie Tate to' be the sole heir of Gust J. Cremidas, deceased. The finding of the Probate Court insofar as is pertinent here, is as follows:
“William O. Tate is the guardian of Marie Cremidas Tate, a minor, having been duly appointed! and qualified by this Court in a proceeding entitled ‘In the Matter of the Guardianship of Marie Cremidas Tate, a Minor, in Probate No. 805’. Marie…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Tozer v. Charles A. Krause Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Wolfsohn v. RaabDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
3Cited by23 opinions
- Sophie Radack and Charles Radack v. Norwegian America Line Agency, Inc., and Den Norske Amerikalinje, A/sCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- L. P. Steuart, Inc. v. Joseph H. MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Manning Engineering, Inc. v. Hudson County Park CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. GuerraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- Rupert v. Krautheimer (In Re Krautheimer)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.