Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Collins

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 21, 1946No. 15,700PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

These parties appear here in the same order as in the trial court. They are hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs and the board, respectively.

This cause is before us on application for supersedeas. That writ cannot be granted under our rules since the judgment was for costs only, but since the record discloses that it ought not be unnecessarily delayed, and our conclusion is that no judgment we could now enter here would terminate the litigation, we elect to dispose of it for the time being on this application.

The amended complaint contained two causes of action. By the first plaintiffs…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seaton v. TohillColorado Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. People Ex Rel. Stonebraker v. WoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. BK Sweeney Co. v. McQUAY-NORRIS MANUFACTURING CO.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Hawthorne v. ASSURED PREMIUMS CORPORATIONColorado Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Acquisition of Land by the Department of the Air Force, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API