Legal Opinion

Hawkes v. First National Bank

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 15, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

The defendant’s motion for a directed verdict should not have been granted. The jury warrantably could find that the defendant’s testator, and the plaintiff’s *110father as partners carried on a farm of one hundred and sixty-acres in the town of Charlemont from February 27, 1910, to October 9,1925, the date of the testator’s death; that the plaintiff, who was born at the farm, continuously worked for the partnership from February 27, 1910, when he became twenty-one years of age, to October 9, 1925, and that his services were reasonably worth $50 a month including his board. During this period he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spencer v. SpencerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  2. McKenna v. TwomblyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  3. True v. LebowichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hawkes v. First National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  2. Adams v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. Allen v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  4. Walsh v. John J. Walsh & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API