State v. Blair
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAUGHTREY, Judge.
The charges in this case arose from an act of forced sodomy allegedly committed by defendant Nathaniel Blair against his fellow jail inmate, David Duggan. The defendant did not testify, but the theory of the defense was that no attack occurred on the night in question. To support this theory, the defendant produced the testimony of several other prisoners incarcerated in the same cell block as Blair and Duggan. The jury nevertheless found Blair guilty of committing a crime against nature * and of being a habitual criminal. We have determined that Blair’s conviction and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. HatchettTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- State v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
- Cotton v. Willmar & Sioux Falls Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Phillips v. Newport Et Ux.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BurkeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
- In Re: Estate of James A. Hamilton a/k/a James Robert HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
- State of Tennessee v. Christopher Jerald CrowleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2018